Evidence before inference
We distinguish observation from interpretation, and interpretation from action.
Hardware-independent signal analysis
ASH helps teams assess recordings from different devices: what is usable, what may be noise, and what needs closer review.
Explore the approach ↓Research principles shared publicly · Implementation kept private
Before interpreting a signal
Check how it was recorded, where data is missing, and how much noise it contains.
01 / Philosophy
Our analysis accounts for how the data was collected and what it can support.
We distinguish observation from interpretation, and interpretation from action.
We consider how collection conditions and variation affect the analysis.
A result should be traceable to its source and possible to reproduce.
We state what the data supports and where it leaves uncertainty.
02 / Approach
We review the recording and its quality before interpreting patterns.
Review the original signal and the available information about its capture.
Identify noise and missing data that could affect the result.
Examine patterns alongside the conditions in which they were recorded.
Document the findings, the evidence behind them, and what remains uncertain.
03 / Research
These questions guide our research. We share our approach while keeping implementation details and sensitive data private.
04 / How we partner
We work with teams that collect or analyze physiological signals. Together, we define the question, the data available, and what we will deliver.
We investigate a specific question and deliver a comparison, a recommendation, and the evidence behind it.
We review noise, artifacts, recording conditions, and traceability, then document how they affect the analysis.
We build a small prototype that takes a signal through analysis to a documented result the team can inspect and reproduce.
05 / Roent
We distinguish correlation from causation, state when evidence is incomplete, and protect the privacy of the data we work with.